tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post3996494477203986150..comments2023-10-12T15:15:44.063+01:00Comments on The Manchester City Project: Man United spend £409 Million on TransfersSteve Murphyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00084212355534312899noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-80361858120619971352012-04-30T22:48:33.368+01:002012-04-30T22:48:33.368+01:00So you have said that in the years since mansour t...So you have said that in the years since mansour took over they have spent over 200 mil? right?<br />United have spent, in 20 years, double what city have in 4.<br />Sit down. LUHGAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-65958078086977174342012-01-22T19:41:28.710+00:002012-01-22T19:41:28.710+00:00You should be a politician- Murphy the way you try...You should be a politician- Murphy the way you try to twist reality.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-48691210797356878042011-09-15T05:50:13.979+01:002011-09-15T05:50:13.979+01:00since 1992 man u have spent 483 million on players...since 1992 man u have spent 483 million on players, a massive amount true. since 1992 man city have spent 655 million on players, with 1 result, the fa cup. after you take into account players sold since 1992, manu recieved 300 million, mancity 163 million. therefore in the 19 years manu have spent an average of 9.6 mill a season while man city have spent 25 mill. now take into account the relative sucesses and id have to say its a disgrace what man city are doing and the spotlight should be well and truely on them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-50451280674588582512011-09-12T20:09:58.758+01:002011-09-12T20:09:58.758+01:00FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES
Below is a list of all ...FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES<br />Below is a list of all transfers since 2006. They key thing to realise here is that Man U are actually 8th with teams like liverpool, tottenham and villa spending more per season, based on players coming in (and out). conclusive proof that fergie is a genuis in the transfer window and that man u dont just buy success!<br /> <br />1 Manchester City <br />Gross £537,670,000 <br />Sold £100,550,000 <br />Nett £437,120,000 <br />per season £87,424,000<br /><br />2 Chelsea <br />£267,100,000 <br />£122,200,000 <br />£144,900,000 <br />£28,980,000<br /><br />3 Liverpool <br />£309,540,000 <br />£225,530,000 <br />£84,010,000 <br />£16,802,000<br /><br />4 Tottenham <br />£238,300,000 <br />£162,100,000 <br />£76,200,000 <br />£15,240,000<br /><br />5 Aston Villa <br />£168,550,000 <br />£100,400,000 <br />68,150,000 <br />£13,630,000<br /><br />6 Sunderland <br />£146,900,000 <br />£84,225,000 <br />£62,675,000 <br />£12,535,000<br /><br />7 Stoke City <br />£72,725,000 <br />£11,520,000 <br />£61,205,000 <br />£12,241,000<br /><br />8 Manchester United <br />£217,200,000 <br />£160,350,000 <br />£56,850,000 <br />£11,370,000Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-11836221995741802952011-08-17T15:11:57.062+01:002011-08-17T15:11:57.062+01:00SO WHAT YOU ARE BASICALLY SAYING IS THAT IN 19 YEA...SO WHAT YOU ARE BASICALLY SAYING IS THAT IN 19 YEARS OF PREMIERSHIP FOOTBALL UNITED HAVE SPEN £100 MILLION LESS THAN CITY HAVE SPENT IN 3 YEARS!!!<br /><br />GREAT WAY TO PROVE YOUR POINT LOL!!!<br /><br />TYPICAL DOPEY BITTER!!!<br /><br />ALL THAT TIME IN UNITED'S SHADOW HAS GIVEN YOU BRAIN DAMAGE SON LOL!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-84891069267663901472011-03-30T15:05:25.643+01:002011-03-30T15:05:25.643+01:00An stupid post, http://www.transferleague.co.uk/An stupid post, http://www.transferleague.co.uk/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-84253664324775314222010-08-22T11:34:30.593+01:002010-08-22T11:34:30.593+01:00Money to buy players does not soley come from play...Money to buy players does not soley come from players out. For example the massive amount of coinage spent on Ronaldo - this has had to pay off debt.<br /><br />There are many other things that a club needs to spend money on other than players transfer fees.<br /><br />Therefore you have to see each type of item serperately to analyse it, like a nominal code analysis from a trial balance.<br /><br />We are comparing SPENDING ON PLAYERS not the Profit and Loss account, we are certainly not comparing only parts of the Profit and Loss account to suit the argument of the Man City hatred.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4111697418914042488.post-78356031564220157312010-08-22T03:42:47.278+01:002010-08-22T03:42:47.278+01:00How much did each team make on transfers in teh sa...How much did each team make on transfers in teh same period though?<br /><br />Net spend is what really matters here. No?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com